The irony in "The Ransom of Red Chief" runs throughout the story. The most extreme example of it comes with the core incident: the reversal of the kidnapping. In a classic straightforward kidnapping, the criminals take a person. They have the power, and the kidnapped person becomes the victim, and lives at their mercy. They get money for returning the victim safely. By contrast, in this story the kidnappers end up at the mercy of the little boy, and the letter asks them to pay in order to give the boy back: " You bring Johnny home and pay me two hundred and fifty dollars in cash, and I agree to take him off your hands." The entire situation is reversed and the criminals end up running away. That's pretty ironic.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
In Act III, scene 2, why may the establishment of Claudius's guilt be considered the crisis of the revenge plot?
The crisis of a drama usually proceeds and leads to the climax. In Shakespeare's Hamlet , the proof that Claudius is guilty...
-
Montag recognizes himself in Clarisse's eyes, indicating that there is a reflection of himself in her. Although he doesn't fully re...
-
Jem and Scout's visit to First Purchase African M.E. Church is significant for many reasons. First, the children experience racism for t...
-
The Nazis used hunger, fear, and violence to indoctrinate the prisoners into camp. The Nazis broke the prisoners down to their most basic an...
No comments:
Post a Comment