Wednesday, November 30, 2011

My question is about Mrs. Slade and Mrs. Ansley in "Roman Fever". What value is there, if any, in such a competitive ''Friendship''?

Many relationships between friends have a competitive edge to them.  Think about it--two athletes, two beauty queens, to honor students--they are in friendly competition daily for the same position on the team, the same crown in a pageant, the grade point average which will land them the title of valedictorian.  These friendly competitions can encourage a higher level of performance and perhaps give the "prize" a bit more meaning and sense of accomplishment.

However, Mrs. Slade and Mrs. Ansley would never choose to be friends or even acquaintances if given the option.  They have been forced into the relationship they have based on social position by marriage and traveling in the same circles.  They competed for the love of the same man which can never come to any good.  Resentment and bitterness are the only results one can expect from such a competition.  If in fact, the competition continues throughout their lives, Mrs. Slade most definitely loses with Mrs. Ansley's slam-dunk news.  Perhaps she revels in being the thorn under her "friend's" skin as often as she can.

Ironically, the women's daughters seem to genuinely be friends. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

In Act III, scene 2, why may the establishment of Claudius's guilt be considered the crisis of the revenge plot?

The crisis of a drama usually proceeds and leads to the climax.  In Shakespeare's Hamlet , the proof that Claudius is guilty...