Sunday, June 1, 2014

How did Nelson Mandela differ from Steve Biko in his leadership and fight against apartheid? How were they the same?

The most obvious difference is that Mandela lives to
assume Presidential leadership and political power and Biko did not.  This might also
reflect a similarity in that both were victim to imprisonment and the "enhanced
interrogation" that goes along with it.  In terms of their leadership positions, the
absence of one led to the rise of the other.  When Mandela was imprisoned, it caused a
void in the leadership of Black South Africans against Apartheid.  While Mandela was
imprisoned for his militant approach that was rooted in the idea that military action
can lead to political change, Biko was arguing for a mental and spiritual consciousness
change in how Black South Africans saw themselves.  On many levels, Biko argued that the
consciousness and self perception of Blacks have to change before political leadership
change can be effective.  Whereas Mandela argued that political change is its own end,
Biko argued that Apartheid will come to an end when Blacks begin to understand that
their own sense of self is beyond being controlled by Apartheid tactics, it will come to
its own end because Blacks "are not going to take it anymore."  This becomes the reason
why the Soweto Uprisings, inspired by Biko, become so important in South African
History.

No comments:

Post a Comment

In Act III, scene 2, why may the establishment of Claudius's guilt be considered the crisis of the revenge plot?

The crisis of a drama usually proceeds and leads to the climax.  In Shakespeare's Hamlet , the proof that Claudius is guilty...