Tuesday, July 1, 2014

In A Doll's Houase, is Nora a victim of circumstance or a villain who brings about problems?

I should preface this by saying that I don't really find her a victim, so my analysis here might be a bit biased.  I will try to overcome.


In terms of why I might argue that she is at fault, I would suggest that Nora does not activate her voice despite knowing that things are "not right"- There are plenty of opportunities when Nora herself realizes that Torvald treats her in a "thinglike" manner.  She fails to act on this until the very end.  By allowing this to happen and permitting this state of affairs, she bears some culpability in her predicament.  Finally, a reason why Nora might be at fault for her situation is that she truly does not know her husband.  She seems to be operating under a pretense of how she thinks of him to be, and only in the end does she realize that her husband truly does treat her in a degrading manner.  An open dialogue between husband and wife earlier could have revealed this or prompted change.  Her failure to initiate such a discussion rests with her.


In terms of how she is a victim of circumstance, I would begin and end with the social structure of marriage at the time.  This conception of marriage "stacked the deck" against an equal conception of power in marriage.  This rendering of marriage, in terms of what society deems as "successful marriages", result in men holding most of the power and women being relegated to "trophy status."  The favoring of men in this arrangement also stipulates that women have to be loyal to men throughout and do whatever is needed to "keep the marriage intact."  This responsibility rests with the women.  Thus, women have the pressure to bear for a successful marriage devoid of power.  In this setting, how is Nora supposed to activate her voice without risking a great level of inertia or social censure?  Even without the institution of marriage going against Nora, the social setting within which she is living is not one predisposed to advocating for the rights of women.  There is little to indicate in the play that women can work in the open, demand equal opportunity or equal pay or equality in political representation.  If there is such a silence of women's voices entrenched in the social setting, it becomes a tad unrealistic to demand Nora to be a feminist voice in her marriage.  Given this social setting and this conception of marriage, the fact that she does activate her voice at the end of the play makes her actions all the more powerful.

No comments:

Post a Comment

In Act III, scene 2, why may the establishment of Claudius's guilt be considered the crisis of the revenge plot?

The crisis of a drama usually proceeds and leads to the climax.  In Shakespeare's Hamlet , the proof that Claudius is guilty...