Friday, November 27, 2015

How do you think a director in Shakespeare’s time might solve the problem of staging a ghost?

If we read the text of the ghost scenes carefully, I think we can piece together that Shakespeare rather neatly sidesteps the need for any special effects.

In Act 1, Scene 1, Bernardo remarks that the ghost comes 'in the same figure like the King that's dead' - that the ghost, in short, looks exactly the dead King used to look. It is, Horatio later mentions, a 'fair and warlike form'. If its form is 'fair', there's no rotting flesh, no zombie eyes: what's freaky about this ghost is that it's so instantly familiar, but that the person it looks like is dead and buried.

Horatio reiterates this later on, before providing us with some useful further information:

MARCELLUS: Is it not like the King?
 HORATIO: As thou art to thyself.
Such was the very armour he had on
When he the ambitious Norway combated.

The ghost, in short, wears a full suit of armour: you can't see his body. And the characters helpfully point out that this suit of armour is one that King Hamlet used to wear. Again, there's no white sheets: Shakespeare provides the solution within the text.

Finally, there would have been a trapdoor in the stage which scholars think that the ghost would have used for his cries of 'Swear' in Act 1, Scene 5 from under the stage (Hamlet compares him to a mole, burrowing under the earth). However, the 'crane' stage machinery is believed not to have been installed in the Elizabethan theatre until long after Shakespeare wrote Hamlet.

No comments:

Post a Comment

In Act III, scene 2, why may the establishment of Claudius's guilt be considered the crisis of the revenge plot?

The crisis of a drama usually proceeds and leads to the climax.  In Shakespeare's Hamlet , the proof that Claudius is guilty...