Sunday, January 9, 2011

Why is the ambiguity of Holden's age stressed in chapters 1-4 of The Catcher in the Rye?

The Catcher in the Rye is told in
flashback as Holden, age 17,  narrates from a rest home in California.  The action of
the story proper takes place the previous year, when he is 16.  He says on page
9:



I was
sixteen then, and I'm seventeen now, and sometimes I act like I'm about
thirteen.



The irony, of
course, is that Holden looks much older than his chronological age.  Since he has
undergone a massive growth spurt and has gray hair, Holden looks like hes is in his 20s,
old enough to get into bars and clubs in the city without being
carded.


Emotionally, however, Holden acts like a pre-teen.
 Since the death of his brother Allie, Holden has turned conservative, wishing to never
enter the teenage or adult worlds.  He would rather stay a child, as they are the only
non-phonies in the book, except for the nuns.  According to Holden, children are more
honest and innocent because they have not been corrupted by the materialism and sexual
deviancy of the adult world.


So, Holden looks much older
than he really is and he acts much younger than he really is in order both to relish in
and escape from the adult world.  In this way, Salinger achieves a kind of double
movement as he juxtaposes the emotional and physical problems of his
protagonist.

No comments:

Post a Comment

In Act III, scene 2, why may the establishment of Claudius's guilt be considered the crisis of the revenge plot?

The crisis of a drama usually proceeds and leads to the climax.  In Shakespeare's Hamlet , the proof that Claudius is guilty...