Friday, March 4, 2011

Macbeth is both a bloody tyrant and a tragic hero in Macbeth. How so?

I think the "bloody tyrant" part is pretty self-evident, so let's think about the "tragic hero" part.  Aristotle sets out the key elements of tragedy, and they include the following:


1.  A character must fall from a high place.  It seems to me that Macbeth's true fall was not from his position as king but from his position as trusted cousin and soldier of the King to a murderous tyrant.  From that position he falls; he is king, but he's not respected or revered so his fall goes nearly unnoticed or worse--it's seen as a relief.


2.  The character must fall, in large part, due to his own behaviors.  That's certainly true for Macbeth.


3.  The character must receive a punishment which is generally more than he deserves.  Most of us, I think, would say Macbeth deserved every bit of what he got--and perhaps more.


4.  The audience must feel pity and fear (awe).  There is certainly some sense of awe or fear for the audience when it considers the situation of Macbeth; however, we feel little sympathy for him until maybe his wife dies.  It is then we sense his despair and hopelessness.  The audience is quick to say he brought it all on himself, of course; but we do have a sense of pity because of his final self-awareness and resignation. 


In short, Macbeth is probably as much tragic hero as he is bloody tyrant, making him one of the most tortured and tyrannical protagonists in Shakespeare's works.

No comments:

Post a Comment

In Act III, scene 2, why may the establishment of Claudius's guilt be considered the crisis of the revenge plot?

The crisis of a drama usually proceeds and leads to the climax.  In Shakespeare's Hamlet , the proof that Claudius is guilty...