Saturday, July 30, 2011

What is an example of situational irony in Act II, Scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet?

In this scene, Mercutio and Benvolio have witnessed Romeo climb the wall surrounding the Capulet property and jump into their garden. They desperately wish him to be with them and cry out to him, to no avail; Romeo is deaf to their call, for he has only one purpose in mind - to be with Juliet.


Mercutio, in order to see Romeo, mentions that he will use magic to at least see or hear his friend utter even a sigh. He beseeches Romeo to say but one loving word, so that he may know that he is unharmed. However, his appeal goes unanswered. He realises that Romeo is not going to respond to his call and that he must "conjure" him, making references to Rosaline. Because of this, Romeo would appear to them.


Benvolio comments that if Mercutio should use Rosaline's name in such a way, Romeo would be upset, but Mercutio says that he only wishes to "raise" Romeo, i.e. awaken him, make him respond to their call, and therefore it is fair that he should so 'abuse' Rosaline's name.


The situational irony lies in the fact that Benvolio and Mercutio are under the impression that Romeo is in love with Rosaline and all their remarks revolve around her. Mercutio's lewd sexual references have Rosaline as the subject. The two are completely unaware of the fact that Romeo has now fallen head-over-heels in love with Juliet and any references to Rosaline would have no effect on him at this point.


Furthermore, they are next to the Capulets' wall yet they speak about Rosaline, when in actuality, they should be making references to Juliet. However, they do not know of Romeo's new romantic interest.

No comments:

Post a Comment

In Act III, scene 2, why may the establishment of Claudius's guilt be considered the crisis of the revenge plot?

The crisis of a drama usually proceeds and leads to the climax.  In Shakespeare's Hamlet , the proof that Claudius is guilty...