Saturday, June 27, 2015

In "Flowers for Algernon," how did the doctors know that the operation was not going to be permanently successful?

The first indication that the doctors, Nemur and Strauss, have ambivalence about the success of Charley's operation comes in "Progress Report 10."  Charley overhears the colleagues arguing.  Nemur wants to present their "experiment" at a conference.

Nemur:  "We've predicted the pattern correctly so far.  We're justified in making this interim report.  I tell you Jay, there's nothing to be afraid of.  We've succeeded.  It's all positive.  Nothing can go wrong now."

Strauss:  "This is too important to all  of us to bring it out into the open prematurely."

Nemur's claim that "(n)othing can go wrong" serves as both foreshadowing and irony.  It foreshadows the fact that Charley will regress; it is ironic because nothing could be further from the truth.

As the novel progresses, there are hints that the Strauss and Nemur are unsure of the permanency of Charely's improved cognition.   In Progress Reports 13, Charley notices Algernon's waning ability to navigate the mazes.  Finally, in Progress Report 15, Charley demands to know the doctors intentions and his fate.  Nemur admits that they did not know what would happen, but "we decided to risk it with you, because we felt there was very little chance of doing you any serious harm and we wanted to do you some good."  Horrifically, for Charley, Nemur tells him that when his faculties fail, he will be sent to the Warren State Home. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

In Act III, scene 2, why may the establishment of Claudius's guilt be considered the crisis of the revenge plot?

The crisis of a drama usually proceeds and leads to the climax.  In Shakespeare's Hamlet , the proof that Claudius is guilty...