Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Why has there been proposals to expand the number of permanent members on the UN Security Council?What are the reasons for and against doing this...

The United Nations was formed in 1945, immediately following World War II in hopes of avoiding future such wars.  The victors, the Allied powers, each received a seat on the Permanent Security Council and an important perk that came with it: veto power.


In the modern day, Japan and Germany are democracies and major trading partners with us and the rest of the world, so they can make a credible claim that the world's second largest economy (Japan) and largest economy in Europe (Germany) deserve a seat at the same table.


The problem is, since the current members have veto power, they can simply veto any proposal to change the current makeup of the Security Council.  Russia doesn't particularly like Germany and China does not particularly like Japan, and so their membership has always been vetoed or threatened with veto.  Why should they vote yes when it diminishes their own power and influence? 


Another  reason it could cause problems is that with two new vetoes on board, it would be even more difficult for the UN to get anything done, when it's already pretty difficult now.

No comments:

Post a Comment

In Act III, scene 2, why may the establishment of Claudius's guilt be considered the crisis of the revenge plot?

The crisis of a drama usually proceeds and leads to the climax.  In Shakespeare's Hamlet , the proof that Claudius is guilty...