The civilization ended in a catastrophic war that included huge explosions and a "poisonous mist". It's important to understand the this story was written eight years before the atomic bomb was first exploded, so the author was somewhat prophetic in his explanation of society's end. However, John's explanation for the god's destruction was that they "ate knowledge too fast". In other words, they didn't know how to control the knowledge they had gained and it ending up destroying them. John thinks that his people can avoid repeating the mistakes of the old civilization. The author is thus commenting on the cycle of history where one civilization rises and then falls and another civilization takes its place. We don't know if John's people can avoid repeating the mistakes of the "gods", but given human nature, and John's excited comments about sharing his knowledge with his people, one would doubt that they could avoid the same mistakes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
In Act III, scene 2, why may the establishment of Claudius's guilt be considered the crisis of the revenge plot?
The crisis of a drama usually proceeds and leads to the climax. In Shakespeare's Hamlet , the proof that Claudius is guilty...
-
From the very beginning, Maggie and Momma are people who take what life gives them and makes the best of it. They live simply and happily--...
-
How does Dickens use humour and pathos in his Great Expectations?Please give a detailed explanation.In his bildungsroman, Great Expectations , Charles Dickens employs humor and comic relief through the use of ridiculous and silly characters...
-
The main association between the setting in Act 5 and the predictions in Act 4 is that in Act 4 the withches predict that Macbeth will not d...
No comments:
Post a Comment