Montresor is an unreliable narrator, yes, because he is clearly mentally unstable. He cannot be trusted. In addition, there is no evidence that Forunato did, in fact, insult or do anything of great harm to Montresor at all in the story. Poe provides no details. Because the narrator is unreliable, we cannot trust him when he says that Fortunato has wronged him. We do not know if this is true at all. EVen if Montresor HAD provided evidence, we still could not trust him because he is an unreliable narrator. For all we know, he could be making it up. It does not take long to look for evidence to support the fact that Montresor cannot be trusted and is unreliable because of his murderous plot and because he is emotionless and remorseless for what he is doing. He has no regrets and is happy with his plans.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
In Act III, scene 2, why may the establishment of Claudius's guilt be considered the crisis of the revenge plot?
The crisis of a drama usually proceeds and leads to the climax. In Shakespeare's Hamlet , the proof that Claudius is guilty...
-
From the very beginning, Maggie and Momma are people who take what life gives them and makes the best of it. They live simply and happily--...
-
How does Dickens use humour and pathos in his Great Expectations?Please give a detailed explanation.In his bildungsroman, Great Expectations , Charles Dickens employs humor and comic relief through the use of ridiculous and silly characters...
-
The main association between the setting in Act 5 and the predictions in Act 4 is that in Act 4 the withches predict that Macbeth will not d...
No comments:
Post a Comment