Saturday, November 30, 2013

Who is more to blame for slavery continuing -- the presidents or the people?don't be shy

Have to hand it to the people on this one.  While
President James Monroe tried compensated emancipation - buying slaves' freedom and then
returning them to Africa, it was not a popular policy or a successful
one.


Other Presidents who might have leaned towards
abolition had to be very careful.  I would compare it, just for the sake of comparing,
to gay marriage today as an issue.  That is, right or wrong, many people in the United
States oppose making it legal, so if I was to campaign for that issue, it would be
difficult to get elected, especially in certain
states.


Presidents at that time knew they could not get
elected with a majority if they were openly for abolition.  The only reason Lincoln won
- and remember, he did not campaign for abolition, only stopping slavery's spread - was
because there were two Democrats running against him, and they split the vote.  He only
had 41% of the final vote.

Who is more to blame for slavery continuing -- the presidents or the people?don't be shy

Have to hand it to the people on this one.  While President James Monroe tried compensated emancipation - buying slaves' freedom and then returning them to Africa, it was not a popular policy or a successful one.


Other Presidents who might have leaned towards abolition had to be very careful.  I would compare it, just for the sake of comparing, to gay marriage today as an issue.  That is, right or wrong, many people in the United States oppose making it legal, so if I was to campaign for that issue, it would be difficult to get elected, especially in certain states.


Presidents at that time knew they could not get elected with a majority if they were openly for abolition.  The only reason Lincoln won - and remember, he did not campaign for abolition, only stopping slavery's spread - was because there were two Democrats running against him, and they split the vote.  He only had 41% of the final vote.

How is the setting of "Greasy Lake" perfect for this grim story?

The setting of "Greasy Lake" is very important to this story.  The lake in the story used to be very pristeen and was given an Indian name for pure or clear water.  However, the lake is now loaded with trash and is a gathering place for degenerates and troublemakers.  It has become a place that is no longer beautiful and pristeen.  It is now a murky, trashy, foul-smelling lake.  Clearly, the horrible events of the night of the story wouldn't have taken place at a very clean, beautiful site.  Because it takes place at night, as well, is of great importance.  These events wouldn't have occurred if it had been daytime, for example.

What metaphor is there in "A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings"?

The overarching metaphor is that of the fallen angel, the old, decrepit being who arrives on Pelayo and Elisenda's farm. His degenerative state is a reflective metaphor for the impoverished state of their faith. Marquez writes:

There were only a few faded hairs left on his bald skull and very few teeth in his mouth, and his pitiful condition of a drenched great-grandfather took away any sense of grandeur he might have had. His huge buzzard wings, dirty and half-plucked, were forever entangled in the mud. They looked at him so long and so closely that Pelayo and Elisenda very soon overcame their surprise and in the end found him familiar.

A miraculous being has landed in their midst, yet the couple soon treats the angel like a sideshow attraction rather than a servant of God. Like Eve before her, Elisenda sees a way to exploit her situation:

Elisenda, her spine all twisted from sweeping up so much marketplace trash, then got the idea of fencing in the yard and charging five cents admission to see the angel.

Never cognizant of the miracle, and because they cannot connect their expectations of God's ways to reality, the angel leaves. The couple is no more enlightened than before the angel came. Soon Pelayo and Elisenda will descend into a pit of mortality. As the old angel finally flies away, Elisenda observes his departure and "let out a sigh of relief, for herself and for him." It's too hard, she seems to say, to deal with God's expectations.

Friday, November 29, 2013

In Dante's "Inferno," why does Francesca's heart still hurt and ache?

Francesca's heart still aches because she is still experiencing the sin, but now with full understanding of its meaning and importance. Those emotions—and her clinging to them-- are part of the punishment. This shows how sinners cling to their sin, and how rarely they change, even in hell.

Is it fair to say that in Sophocles "Oedipus is innocent and gods are evil"? Give reasons for your answer.just compare the two

Certainly, there is a part of the quote that is quite
accurate.  Oedipus is not entirely and fully responsible for his fate.  Yet, I would
suggest that we cannot call him entirely "innocent" because he does demonstrate a sense
of hubris when it is not necessary.  His repudiation of Tiresias and of the belief that
he is subject to the will of the fates are examples of a character flaw.  While this is
not deliberate, I cannot feel entirely comfortable calling him "innocent."  He does
understand, at the end, his own lack of vision.  Certainly, it is noted that he does
suffer for being human, no more, no less.  In terms of the Gods being evil, I think that
similar analysis applies for it does not seem like the gods deliberately target
Oedipus.  Rather, he becomes a part of the larger drama.  While the gods could have done
more to spare him, they do not strike me as overtly evil for, in this case, if the
standard for evil is the mere not taking action, a very rigid definition
emerges.

Is it fair to say that in Sophocles "Oedipus is innocent and gods are evil"? Give reasons for your answer.just compare the two

Certainly, there is a part of the quote that is quite accurate.  Oedipus is not entirely and fully responsible for his fate.  Yet, I would suggest that we cannot call him entirely "innocent" because he does demonstrate a sense of hubris when it is not necessary.  His repudiation of Tiresias and of the belief that he is subject to the will of the fates are examples of a character flaw.  While this is not deliberate, I cannot feel entirely comfortable calling him "innocent."  He does understand, at the end, his own lack of vision.  Certainly, it is noted that he does suffer for being human, no more, no less.  In terms of the Gods being evil, I think that similar analysis applies for it does not seem like the gods deliberately target Oedipus.  Rather, he becomes a part of the larger drama.  While the gods could have done more to spare him, they do not strike me as overtly evil for, in this case, if the standard for evil is the mere not taking action, a very rigid definition emerges.

EXPLAIN HOW EXPANSIONARY FISCAL POLICY CAN,UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, DESTABILIZE THE ECONOMY.PLEASE WRITE THIS ANSWER AS YOU WOULD FOR A QUESTION...

In general, the most likely way for expansionary fiscal
policy to destabilize an economy is for this fiscal policy to "overheat the economy." 
This would happen if expansionary fiscal policy is undertaken at a time when the economy
is already expanding well enough on its own.


If an economy
is at the classical range of the AS curve, expansionary fiscal policy will serve only to
fuel inflation.  This is true because the tax cuts or spending increases will move the
AD curve to the right.  In such a case, this policy could destabilize the economy by
causing demand pull inflation.

EXPLAIN HOW EXPANSIONARY FISCAL POLICY CAN,UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, DESTABILIZE THE ECONOMY.PLEASE WRITE THIS ANSWER AS YOU WOULD FOR A QUESTION...

In general, the most likely way for expansionary fiscal policy to destabilize an economy is for this fiscal policy to "overheat the economy."  This would happen if expansionary fiscal policy is undertaken at a time when the economy is already expanding well enough on its own.


If an economy is at the classical range of the AS curve, expansionary fiscal policy will serve only to fuel inflation.  This is true because the tax cuts or spending increases will move the AD curve to the right.  In such a case, this policy could destabilize the economy by causing demand pull inflation.

Thursday, November 28, 2013

What is Pip’s reaction to Biddy’s letter in Chapter 27 of "Great Expectations"?

Pip is not enthusiastic about receiving Biddy's letter telling him that Joe Gargery is coming to see him in London.  He notes that he received the letter "not with pleasure, though I was bound to (Joe) by so many ties...if I could have kept him away by paying money, I certainly would have paid money".  Pip, having become a "gentleman", is ashamed of Joe, and ashamed of himself for feeling that way.  Pip has developed a snobbish attitude, although it is not Herbert or Herbert's father whose reaction to Joe he dreads the most, but Bentley Drummle's, a character whom Pip strongly dislikes.  Pip is not unaware of of the irony of his own feelings, observing that "so throughout life our worst weaknesses and meannesses are committed for the sake of people whom we most despise.

Joe arrives the next day, and his visit is indeed uncomfortable for all.  Joe's unrefined mannerisms are grossly out of place at the formal dinner table, and Pip's behavior makes Joe feel inferior.  Joe does bring news from Estella, and conveys her desire to see Pip again.  Pip is excited to receive this news, and tries to be a little nicer to Joe, but it is too late.  Joe is leaving, and tells Pip that he will not come again, but that Pip can come visit him at the forge, where the situation will undoubtedly be more comfortable (Chapter 27).

Who wrote the English Law, and who was the writer of the Magna Carta?

The English charter of liberty was signed by King John, under duress, he was forced into signing the document at Runnymede June 15, 1215, which reduced his power as king.

"The content of the Magna Carta was drafted by Archbishop Stephen Langton and the most powerful Barons of England. King John signed the document which was originally called the 'Articles of the Barons' on June 10, 1215. The barons renewed the Oath of Fealty to King John on June 15, 1215. The royal chancery produced a formal royal grant, based on the agreements reached at Runnymede, which became known as Magna Carta. Copies of the Magna Carta were distributed to bishops, sheriffs and other important people throughout England".

What two things does Jane learn at Moor House (other than her inheritance)?

The chapters you want to focus on are 33 and 35 to answer
this question. Chapter 33 details how St. John one snowy night comes to Jane´s school
house and tells her about her uncle dying and then the inheritance she has received. He
also tells her how she and St. John and his sisters are related - they are cousins. This
chapter is also when Jane realises that St. John knows who she really is and her past
relations with Rochester. Take note of how important the realisation that Jane has
family is to her. After many chapters of thinking she was in the world by herself,
finally she has family that she can call her own, and this is of far more worth than
money:


readability="12">

Glorious discovery to a lonely wretch! This was
wealth indeed! - wealth to the heart! - a mine of pure, genial affection. This was a
blessing, bright, vivid, and exhilarating - not like the ponderous gift of gold: rich
and welcome enough in its way, but sobering from its
weight.



To Jane, this
discovery is of far more importance than her inheritance, and marks her rise, not just
in terms of wealth, but also in terms of connections - a vital aspect of life in
Victorian society. Note how it is described as though it were gold, but not "sobering in
its weight".


Chapter 34 and 35 marks the discovery that her
cousin St. John wants to marry her - but not for love, only so he can have a suitable
work-mate to help him with his missionary work. Jane finally finds the strength to
refuse him and at the end of the Chapter she "hears" Rochester´s voice calling to her,
which is very important as it gives her the strength to break free from the constricting
relationship with St. John and leave to find Rochester. Note how Jane ends this
chapter:



I
broke from St. John; who had followed, and would have detained me. It was
my time to assume ascendancy. My powers were
in play, and in force.



This
is the knowledge or the "push" that Jane needs to assert herself and her own will to
live her own life rather than being pushed into living the life others would have her
live.

What two things does Jane learn at Moor House (other than her inheritance)?

The chapters you want to focus on are 33 and 35 to answer this question. Chapter 33 details how St. John one snowy night comes to Jane´s school house and tells her about her uncle dying and then the inheritance she has received. He also tells her how she and St. John and his sisters are related - they are cousins. This chapter is also when Jane realises that St. John knows who she really is and her past relations with Rochester. Take note of how important the realisation that Jane has family is to her. After many chapters of thinking she was in the world by herself, finally she has family that she can call her own, and this is of far more worth than money:



Glorious discovery to a lonely wretch! This was wealth indeed! - wealth to the heart! - a mine of pure, genial affection. This was a blessing, bright, vivid, and exhilarating - not like the ponderous gift of gold: rich and welcome enough in its way, but sobering from its weight.



To Jane, this discovery is of far more importance than her inheritance, and marks her rise, not just in terms of wealth, but also in terms of connections - a vital aspect of life in Victorian society. Note how it is described as though it were gold, but not "sobering in its weight".


Chapter 34 and 35 marks the discovery that her cousin St. John wants to marry her - but not for love, only so he can have a suitable work-mate to help him with his missionary work. Jane finally finds the strength to refuse him and at the end of the Chapter she "hears" Rochester´s voice calling to her, which is very important as it gives her the strength to break free from the constricting relationship with St. John and leave to find Rochester. Note how Jane ends this chapter:



I broke from St. John; who had followed, and would have detained me. It was my time to assume ascendancy. My powers were in play, and in force.



This is the knowledge or the "push" that Jane needs to assert herself and her own will to live her own life rather than being pushed into living the life others would have her live.

What had Colonel Sartoris done for Miss Emily in 1894?

Colonel Sartoris was the mayor of Jefferson when Emily's father died. The Colonel knew that her father had nothing but the house to leave to Emily, so he invented a story about a loan that Emily's father had made to the town long, long ago that the town had never repaid. In return, Emily's property taxes would be remitted, or forgiven, as long as she lived, "into perpetuity." When Colonel Sartoris passed away and a new generation came into control of city government, the truth about her taxes came out, and Emily was asked to pay.

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

What is the plot of "The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County"?

There is not a lot of plot to this -- it is mainly an
excuse to have a few funny tall tales about a gambler in the West in the late
1800s.


The narrator, Mark Twain, goes looking for a man
named Leonidas Smiley.  When he asks about Smiley, a man in a bar starts telling him
about some other guy called Jim Smiley who was an eccentric gambler.  He tells Twain
about all the crazy things this guy would do to gamble.


The
longest story is about how Smiley had a champion jumping frog that he would bet on. 
Someone got the frog to swallow a bunch of lead shot to weigh it down and so Smiley lost
his bet.


Eventually, Twain gets tired of hearing these
stories and leaves without finding out about Leonidas Smiley.

What is the plot of "The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County"?

There is not a lot of plot to this -- it is mainly an excuse to have a few funny tall tales about a gambler in the West in the late 1800s.


The narrator, Mark Twain, goes looking for a man named Leonidas Smiley.  When he asks about Smiley, a man in a bar starts telling him about some other guy called Jim Smiley who was an eccentric gambler.  He tells Twain about all the crazy things this guy would do to gamble.


The longest story is about how Smiley had a champion jumping frog that he would bet on.  Someone got the frog to swallow a bunch of lead shot to weigh it down and so Smiley lost his bet.


Eventually, Twain gets tired of hearing these stories and leaves without finding out about Leonidas Smiley.

What is significant about the town's conclusion regarding the disturbance to the Radley place?

All the neighbors assume that the Radley place was being burglarized by a black man and that he was scared off by Radley's gunfire. They nonchalantly or casually figured that if he returns, Radley will finish him off. This conclusion is significant because it shows that the townspeople assumed that all the illegal activity happening in town was caused by colored people. They had not actually seen the "burglar" but automatically assumed he was black. In all actuality, "he" was Scout, Dill, and Jem, three white children. This incident exemplifies the town's fears, stereotypes, and racist attitude.

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

What are facts about the Battle of Antietam?

This battle was, of course, a battle in the Civil War.  It
was fought in September of 1862.  The battle was fought in the western part of the state
of Maryland.


During this part of the Civil War, the South
was on the offensive.  Robert E. Lee, in charge of the Army of Northern Virginia,
invaded the North (Maryland was a Union state).  By defeating Lee and his army at
Antietam, the Union, led by George McClellan, was able to stop this first attempt to
invade its territory.


This was a horribly bloody battle,
with over 23,000 out of the 100,000 men involved getting killed or
wounded.

What are facts about the Battle of Antietam?

This battle was, of course, a battle in the Civil War.  It was fought in September of 1862.  The battle was fought in the western part of the state of Maryland.


During this part of the Civil War, the South was on the offensive.  Robert E. Lee, in charge of the Army of Northern Virginia, invaded the North (Maryland was a Union state).  By defeating Lee and his army at Antietam, the Union, led by George McClellan, was able to stop this first attempt to invade its territory.


This was a horribly bloody battle, with over 23,000 out of the 100,000 men involved getting killed or wounded.

How does the phrase, "men killed, and died, because they were too embarrassed not to" in the first chapter explicate the theme of shame and guilt?

The line you ask about from "The Things They Carried"
indirectly suggests the idea that the fighting of a war is absurd and uncontrolled and
chaotic and that war is not an idealistic endeavor.


In the
setting of the story, the men are not fighting for ideals.  They're just doing what
they're ordered to and trying to survive.  Specifically, the line you ask about suggests
that soldiers' pride and machismo will not allow them to do anything that would
embarrass or humiliate them.  They fight not for a noble cause, but to avoid
humiliation. 


But this is not negative or shallow.  These
men are trapped.  They are in an impossible situation and maybe the only thing they can
accomplish is to avoid shame and guilt. 


Of course, shame
and guilt can result from fighting as well as not fighting--depending on the
circumstances. 


I don't know if explicate is the best word,
but the line demonstrates the situationally ironic world the soldiers exist in.  Ideals
do not motivate them, but only the need to accept themselves and be accepted by
others. 

How does the phrase, "men killed, and died, because they were too embarrassed not to" in the first chapter explicate the theme of shame and guilt?

The line you ask about from "The Things They Carried" indirectly suggests the idea that the fighting of a war is absurd and uncontrolled and chaotic and that war is not an idealistic endeavor.


In the setting of the story, the men are not fighting for ideals.  They're just doing what they're ordered to and trying to survive.  Specifically, the line you ask about suggests that soldiers' pride and machismo will not allow them to do anything that would embarrass or humiliate them.  They fight not for a noble cause, but to avoid humiliation. 


But this is not negative or shallow.  These men are trapped.  They are in an impossible situation and maybe the only thing they can accomplish is to avoid shame and guilt. 


Of course, shame and guilt can result from fighting as well as not fighting--depending on the circumstances. 


I don't know if explicate is the best word, but the line demonstrates the situationally ironic world the soldiers exist in.  Ideals do not motivate them, but only the need to accept themselves and be accepted by others. 

In "The Most Dangerous Game", what does Rainsford learn from his experience at Ship-Trap Island? And How does Connell show that hunting is a sport...

Connell shows that hunting is a worldwide sport through conversation between Zaroff and Rainsford. Rainsford refers to the Cape Buffalo head hanging on Zaroff's wall; later, Zaroff speaks of a gun that was specially made for him in Moscow, the bears he killed in Russia and the United States, rhinoceroses and crocodiles he hunted, jaguars in the South America, and even brags that he has (basically) hunted anything that could be hunted in every place possible.

By the end of the story, Rainsford has certainly learned what it truly means to be hunted. Near the beginning of the story, Rainsford made snide remarks regarding the feelings of a jaguar being hunted. He implied that he didn't care how the animal felt; however, Rainsford's friend, Whitney, said that the animal cared. Rainsford responded that animals don't understand, to which Whitney replied that they do understand fear. After being hunted himself, Rainsford found that Whitney had been right while he had been quite wrong. It is unrealistic to believe that Rainsford would ever again have hunted without considering the feelings of his prey and remembering what he went through on Ship-Trap Island.

In "The Cask of Amontillado, what does, "A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser" mean?

"Redress" means "to set right" or "to rectify"

"Unredressed"--- the opposite of above.

"Retribution" means "punishment that one deserves for a wrong he has committed"

Montressor is saying that Fortunato has not "paid" for having wronged him, so Montressor is justified in taking restitution for the "insult" done to him.

Monday, November 25, 2013

What sort of mood does Huxley try to create in this book? How does he accomplish this?

In addition to the excellent answer
above:


Brave New World is a comedy.
 He uses several devices of comedy to achieve this novel of
ideas:


situational irony: he
presents two extreme worlds in sharp contrast (the utopia of the Brave New World and the
dystopia of the Savage
Reservation).


satire: the
novel is a mix of parody and satire in order to hold up a mirror to human weakness and
folly.  Huxley creates a "worst case scenario" in order to show the downfall of
human


caricature: Huxley uses
real people and distorts their beliefs.  Henry Ford becomes a god, and Vladimir Lenin
becomes a good-looking nurse (Lenina), all as means of showing how pride and folly
distorts us all.


verbal irony
(hyperbole): Huxley says the opposite of what he means.  He exaggerates
so as to achieve thoughtful laughter and to make his audience realize the slippery slope
in the directions of science and technology as they relate to the death of the
individual.


science fiction:
Huxley changes time and venue to create a futuristic world state.  Little did he know
that the dystopias of the Holocaust and World War II were only a few years away, not 400
years in the future.

What sort of mood does Huxley try to create in this book? How does he accomplish this?

In addition to the excellent answer above:


Brave New World is a comedy.  He uses several devices of comedy to achieve this novel of ideas:


situational irony: he presents two extreme worlds in sharp contrast (the utopia of the Brave New World and the dystopia of the Savage Reservation).


satire: the novel is a mix of parody and satire in order to hold up a mirror to human weakness and folly.  Huxley creates a "worst case scenario" in order to show the downfall of human


caricature: Huxley uses real people and distorts their beliefs.  Henry Ford becomes a god, and Vladimir Lenin becomes a good-looking nurse (Lenina), all as means of showing how pride and folly distorts us all.


verbal irony (hyperbole): Huxley says the opposite of what he means.  He exaggerates so as to achieve thoughtful laughter and to make his audience realize the slippery slope in the directions of science and technology as they relate to the death of the individual.


science fiction: Huxley changes time and venue to create a futuristic world state.  Little did he know that the dystopias of the Holocaust and World War II were only a few years away, not 400 years in the future.

How many themes are present in "Thank You, Ma'am?" Name them.

I see three clear themes in "Thank You, Ma'am" by Langston
Hughes: loss of innocence, second chances, and compassion for
humankind.


In Roger, we see a boy who is maturing into a
young man. However, at the onset of the story, it appears as though his life is headed
in a negative direction. We infer from the story that this episode of purse-snatching is
not Roger's first transgression with the law. We sense that he has lived a troubled life
with few, if any, adults to love and care for him or provide positive role models. In
Mrs. Jones, we see that positive role model emerge. Despite Roger's waiting to be
punished or "taken to jail" for his crime, Mrs. Jones shows Roger compassion and offers
him a second chance.

How many themes are present in "Thank You, Ma'am?" Name them.

I see three clear themes in "Thank You, Ma'am" by Langston Hughes: loss of innocence, second chances, and compassion for humankind.


In Roger, we see a boy who is maturing into a young man. However, at the onset of the story, it appears as though his life is headed in a negative direction. We infer from the story that this episode of purse-snatching is not Roger's first transgression with the law. We sense that he has lived a troubled life with few, if any, adults to love and care for him or provide positive role models. In Mrs. Jones, we see that positive role model emerge. Despite Roger's waiting to be punished or "taken to jail" for his crime, Mrs. Jones shows Roger compassion and offers him a second chance.

What are the similarities between "A Good Man is Hard to Find" and "Revelation"?

Also in both stories the main character is a woman who is smug in her convictions of superior importance. One of O'Connor's aims is the puncture the swollen self-estimates of such people. The irony between what such a person is and what the woman assumes herself to be is emphasized by such techniques as unflattering names (Turpin suggests moral turpitude.) or appearance (The grandmother insists on dressing carefully so that "in case of an accident anyone seeing her dead on the highway" would know she was a lady; ironically, after the wreck, her hat begins to disintegrate.)

Both stories contain violence, another motif often used by O'Connor to shock her characters (and the reader) into an epiphany. Mrs. Turpin is physically assaulted by Mary Grace, first by the book thrown at her and then by the girl's attempt to strangle her; the grandmother hears the gunshots that kill her family one by one prior to her brief epiphany before she, too, is murdered.

In Act IV, scene 1 of "Romeo and Juliet", how does Paris explain the hasty marriage to the Friar?

Paris tells the Friar that Capulet wants the marriage to happen quickly because Juliet has been weeping constantly for the death of her cousin Tybalt.  Capulet believes that the marriage to Paris will help his daughter get over her grief.

The dramatic irony of this scene is that the audience knows that Juliet is not weeping for Tybalt, but that she is already married and weeping because her husband Romeo has been banished for Tybalt's death.  The audience also knows that the Friar is aware of all this, though Paris is ignorant of it.

Many critics believe that Capulet wasn't so concerned about his daughter's grief.  Instead, he was concerned about the Prince giving out punishment for the death of Mercutio, his cousin.  These critics believe that Capulet wanted the marriage to happen quickly because Paris is also the Prince's cousin, and then the Capulet's and the Prince would be connected... perhaps preventing punishment for the family.

How do Tita's recipes reveal her character throughout "Like Water for Chocolate"?

"Tita was washed into this world on a great tide of tears that spilled over the edge of the table and flooded across the kitchen floor" (January, Chap.One, "Christmas Rolls"). From the very opening of this work, Tita's life is connected to two motifs: Sadness and the The Kitchen. We know her sorrow comes from Mama Elena's rule that Tita must care for her and never marry.Tita is never permitted to show her emotion for Pedro,her lover, once he marries her sister, Rosaura. Tita is bound to the kitchen by her love for Nacha and her amazing ability to cook.

Esquivel sets up this plot, then, to allow Tita to express emotion through her recipes. If Tita is sad, February, "Chabela Wedding Cake," for Pedro and her sister's wedding, "Everyone was flooded with a great wave of longing." When Tita is passionate, March, "Quail in Rose Petal Sauce" : "This woman desperately needed a man to quench the red-hot fire that was raging inside her." You can examine any chapter/recipe in the novel and discover  Tita's emotions. Also note that even though the chapters run the course of one year, the 12 months are Tita's entire life span, so as you examine the recipes, look for what is occurring during that period of her life!

Sunday, November 24, 2013

How are the green world and city world reconciled in "A Midsummer Night's Dream"?

Oberon and Titania are fighting and because of this, the weather and climate are affected.  The weather is volatile and tumultuous, just like Oberon and Titania's relationship at this point.  When they fight with each other, it disrupts nature's natural rhythm and causes discontent in the natural world.  This, in turn, also affects the "city world."  Once Oberon casts a spell on Titania (when she falls in love with Bottom) and after he has seen enough of her doting on Bottom, he decides to release the spell.  Afterwards, Titania gives the child to Oberon and due to Titania and Oberon's reconciliation, the natural world returns to its harmonious state again.

What painful memory is "squeezed out" of Granny's heart in "The Jilting of Granny Weatherall"?

It is her memory of being jilted by the boy named George that is "squeezed out" of Granny's heart.  As she drifts in and out of consciousness, Granny is remembering her children, and the life she shared with John, the man she finally married.  She tries to stop herself from thinking about this other, bitter thing, but the memory rises up and "would smother her if she tried to hold it".  Granny tries to look at the positives in her life, noting that even George "never harmed me but in that...but he had not come, just the same".  Despite the fact that she was able to go on afterwards, and admittedly enjoyed a happy life with many blessings, the hurt and humiliation of being left at the altar still rankles.

Saturday, November 23, 2013

What is the highest branch of goverment and why?HI HI HI HI HI ***********************************

I agree with the previous poster. The Constitution was
deliberately written to include a separation of powers between three branches of
government: executive (president), legislative (Congress, comprised of House and Senate)
and Judicial (Supreme Court).Although the President is considered to be the commander in
chief of the armed forces, is the chief executive officer with the power to uphold law,
negotiate treaties with foreign governments, and make key political appointments (a fact
which this office can use to increase its power), the President is still not higher than
any of the other two branches because the executive is subject to checks by the other
two branches. Congress makes laws, but the President can veto them. Congress, in turn,
can also override vetoes. The Supreme Court, meanwhile, is tasked with making sure that
legislation does not come in conflict with what has already been established under the
Constitution. The three branches, then, work in tandem to keep each other from
potentially becoming most powerful, and, when the system works (sometimes because of the
partisan structure of Congress it aligns more with the President and this presents a
different situation) no one branch is ever more powerful than
another.

What is the highest branch of goverment and why?HI HI HI HI HI ***********************************

I agree with the previous poster. The Constitution was deliberately written to include a separation of powers between three branches of government: executive (president), legislative (Congress, comprised of House and Senate) and Judicial (Supreme Court).Although the President is considered to be the commander in chief of the armed forces, is the chief executive officer with the power to uphold law, negotiate treaties with foreign governments, and make key political appointments (a fact which this office can use to increase its power), the President is still not higher than any of the other two branches because the executive is subject to checks by the other two branches. Congress makes laws, but the President can veto them. Congress, in turn, can also override vetoes. The Supreme Court, meanwhile, is tasked with making sure that legislation does not come in conflict with what has already been established under the Constitution. The three branches, then, work in tandem to keep each other from potentially becoming most powerful, and, when the system works (sometimes because of the partisan structure of Congress it aligns more with the President and this presents a different situation) no one branch is ever more powerful than another.

Friday, November 22, 2013

Atticus says that the KKK is "gone." What does this reveal about the kind of person he is?( Given the circumstances could you say that)

I suppose that you can say that this makes Atticus naive
about the level of racism that persisted in Maycomb in his time.  However, I do not
think it does.  In my opinion, it shows that he is
realistic.


The reason I say this is that the KKK really had
not been very active in the South for quite some time by 1935.  The "need" for the KKK
had gone when Reconstruction ended and white people were on top again in the South.  I
mean, when the judicial system kills Tom Robinson for you, what do you need the KKK
for?


So if Atticus had said there was no racism, I'd say he
was an idiot.  But he knows there's racism.  He just says the KKK isn't that
important.


Now, give the context where he says this, I
think he's just brave.  He's trying to reassure his family -- tell them that the mob is
no big deal.  That's brave.

Atticus says that the KKK is "gone." What does this reveal about the kind of person he is?( Given the circumstances could you say that)

I suppose that you can say that this makes Atticus naive about the level of racism that persisted in Maycomb in his time.  However, I do not think it does.  In my opinion, it shows that he is realistic.


The reason I say this is that the KKK really had not been very active in the South for quite some time by 1935.  The "need" for the KKK had gone when Reconstruction ended and white people were on top again in the South.  I mean, when the judicial system kills Tom Robinson for you, what do you need the KKK for?


So if Atticus had said there was no racism, I'd say he was an idiot.  But he knows there's racism.  He just says the KKK isn't that important.


Now, give the context where he says this, I think he's just brave.  He's trying to reassure his family -- tell them that the mob is no big deal.  That's brave.

Find the equation of the line of slope -3/4 that forms with the coordinate axes a triangle which has the area of 24 square units.

First the form of the equation would
be;


y= mx + b, where m is the
slop.


==> y = (-3/4)x +
b


when x = 0, then y = (-3/4) 0 + b=
b


then the point where the line intersect with the y-axis
is (0,b)


when y = 0 , then (-3/4) x +b=
0


==> (3/4) x=
b


==> x= (4/3)b


then
the point where the line intersect with the x-axis is  (4b/3,
0)


but, the area of the triangle
is:


A= 1/2 * 4b/3 * b


24 = 1/2
* 4b/3 *b


24 = 1/2 * 4b^2/3 = 4b^2
/6


==> b^2 =
24*6/4


==> b^2 =
36


==> b = 6, -6


then
the eqution of teh slope is:


y = (-3/4) x + 6    and y=
(-3/4)x -6

Find the equation of the line of slope -3/4 that forms with the coordinate axes a triangle which has the area of 24 square units.

First the form of the equation would be;


y= mx + b, where m is the slop.


==> y = (-3/4)x + b


when x = 0, then y = (-3/4) 0 + b= b


then the point where the line intersect with the y-axis is (0,b)


when y = 0 , then (-3/4) x +b= 0


==> (3/4) x= b


==> x= (4/3)b


then the point where the line intersect with the x-axis is  (4b/3, 0)


but, the area of the triangle is:


A= 1/2 * 4b/3 * b


24 = 1/2 * 4b/3 *b


24 = 1/2 * 4b^2/3 = 4b^2 /6


==> b^2 = 24*6/4


==> b^2 = 36


==> b = 6, -6


then the eqution of teh slope is:


y = (-3/4) x + 6    and y= (-3/4)x -6

Write about the advantages and disadvantages of having Scout as the author.

This is an interesting question. The only disadvantage
that I can see of having Scout as the narrator is that only one perspective is
presented. She is not omniscient. Additionally, this is a memory piece, so we have an
adult looking back in time and speaking through the voice of a child. This can be
problematical because, as time passes, the way that we view events changes. Scout is
remembering the past and telling us about the past but with the knowledge ahead of time
as to how things work out. This can be a disadvantage because there is a built in
narrative bias that colors the reader's perception of
events.


As to the advantages of having Scout as the
narrator, the firat one that I can think of is the fact that she is so close to the
source. She lived the events, so she has an eye-witness perspective. Also, because this
story is told through the eyes of a child, there is a truth and honesty in the telling
that might not exist if it were told through an adult's view of the world. Children are
less jaded, for the most part. They are not molded by society, and they tend to see
things in terms of black and white, right and wrong, without societal prejudgements (for
instance, Scout sees nothing wrong with being at Calpurnia's church, and she sees
everything wring with labeling Tom Robinson as a bad man just because of the color of
his skin). At the same time, she also feels the pressure from the adult world when
people begin to turn against her because Atticus is defending Tom. She does not
understand why the town is turning against them. Yet the simple fact that she does not
fully understand makes the narrative even more powerful for, when we look at the world
through the eyes of a child, things are often much simpler and
clearer.

Write about the advantages and disadvantages of having Scout as the author.

This is an interesting question. The only disadvantage that I can see of having Scout as the narrator is that only one perspective is presented. She is not omniscient. Additionally, this is a memory piece, so we have an adult looking back in time and speaking through the voice of a child. This can be problematical because, as time passes, the way that we view events changes. Scout is remembering the past and telling us about the past but with the knowledge ahead of time as to how things work out. This can be a disadvantage because there is a built in narrative bias that colors the reader's perception of events.


As to the advantages of having Scout as the narrator, the firat one that I can think of is the fact that she is so close to the source. She lived the events, so she has an eye-witness perspective. Also, because this story is told through the eyes of a child, there is a truth and honesty in the telling that might not exist if it were told through an adult's view of the world. Children are less jaded, for the most part. They are not molded by society, and they tend to see things in terms of black and white, right and wrong, without societal prejudgements (for instance, Scout sees nothing wrong with being at Calpurnia's church, and she sees everything wring with labeling Tom Robinson as a bad man just because of the color of his skin). At the same time, she also feels the pressure from the adult world when people begin to turn against her because Atticus is defending Tom. She does not understand why the town is turning against them. Yet the simple fact that she does not fully understand makes the narrative even more powerful for, when we look at the world through the eyes of a child, things are often much simpler and clearer.

What was Shakespeare's worldview?

In England, during Shakespeare's lifetime, there were many political, accademic, artistic, scientific and religious changes occuring. The world was literally expanding through the discovery of new lands. It is reasonable to assume that Shakespeare's worldview was a reflection of this expansive time where questions were being asked on all fronts of human knowledge and expression. He was a great observer of human interaction and of the world around him...as is seen in his work. It seems he was fascinated by a world full of potential mysterious possibilities. It could even be argued that his worldview reflects an intrigue or possible belief in magic. Magical elements appear in Hamlet (the ghost of his father), Macbeth (witches), and fairies also make an appearance in his work.

Although not a lot is known about his life, it is known that he often went to taverns, stayed in lodging-houses, and frequented theatres and their backstages. His life was busy with the work of writing, observing, and recording/responding to what he saw. He was ambitious to create, and this ambitiousness and belief in his ability and his work speak mountains about his worldview -- that issues can be raised and enjoyed and there is freedom in expression. Possibly, he lived and acted on the worldview that  there are endless possibilities to be explored and realized. 

What are 2 quotes from "The Most Dangerous Game" that supports the idea of the importance of choices?

"Oh," said the general, "I give him his option, of course. He need not play that game if he doesn't wish to. If he does not wish to hunt, I turn him over to Ivan. Ivan once had the honor of serving as official knouter to the Great White Czar, and he has his own ideas of sport. Invariably, Mr. Rainsford, invariably they choose the hunt."

Here, the general is telling Rainsford that he does give his prisoners a choice - be hunted or allow Ivan to torture you.  This may not seem like much to choose from, but it is a choice.  If the prisoner chooses to be hunted, he or she has a chance to defend and protect himself.  If turned over to Ivan, the suggestion is that the person would be giving up freedom.  So, this quote not only emphasizes the importance of choices, but also the importance of control - both choices are bad, but most prisoners choose the hunt because it has the appearance of control.

Rainsford knew he could do one of two things. He could stay where he was and wait. That was suicide. He could flee. That was postponing the inevitable. For a moment he stood there, thinking. An idea that held a wild chance came to him, and, tightening his belt, he headed away from the swamp.

Here again, we see that a prisoner must make a clear choice.  Doing nothing is bad and just fleeing in panic is bad - making the choice to fight (again, the theme of control shows up, because to fight is to try for control) is the only way to win.

Thursday, November 21, 2013

What is the the meaning of the title of Achebe's Things Fall Apart? What examples might support this answer?

Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart is a masterful work of fiction, and one that is made even more compelling once the title's literary allusion is taken into consideration. Things Fall Apart is a reference to a line in "The Second Coming," a classic W.B. Yeats poem. Yeats originally published this poem in 1920, a date of extreme historical significance. World War I had recently come to a close, leaving Europe in a state of unimaginable disarray. Even more importantly, Ireland was fighting a war for independence, as the Irish Republican Army was in the midst of an armed conflict with Great Britain that would last until 1921. As such, it is clear that Yeats was responding directly to the chaotic tone of his time in "The Second Coming." For instance, take a look at the third and fourth lines of the poem:



"Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;


Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world..."



When Yeats asserts that "things fall apart," he is responding to the traumatic nature of his era, as it surely must have seemed that his previously orderly society was on the brink of utter destruction. Later on in the poem, when Yeats envisions a "rough beast" approaching "Bethlehem to be born," he essentially describes a perverse Christ figure, and the poem accordingly takes an apocalyptic turn. For Yeats, Europe's constant warfare is a sign of the End of Days and the downfall of society. 


Knowing these facts, it is interesting that Achebe should name his book after Yeats' poem. At the beginning of the novel, Okonkwo is a prosperous and powerful figure, one who has plenty of land, plenty of wives, and an abundance of social clout. However, once Okonkwo kills Ikemefuna, his essentially adopted son, things take a turn for the worst. Okonkwo is exiled, loses his possessions, and is forced to watch in humiliation as white settlers arrive and convert his people to Christianity. Then, once Okonkwo retaliates by burning down the newly-built Christian church in his village, he is forced to commit suicide, a humiliating end for a member of Igbo society.


It is clear that, like Yeats, Achebe envisions the arrival of white settlers as an apocalypse of sorts, as it irreversibly changes the nature of Igbo society. At the end of the novel, Okonkwo's native traditions, values, and beliefs are dismantled and replaced by white culture. As such, like Yeats, Achebe chronicles the end of an era, an apocalyptic finale brought on by violent struggle.


As a parting note, it is interesting that Achebe should title his novel after a poem written by a white author. Since the arrival of white settlers triggers the dramatic changes of Igbo society, Achebe's decision to reference European literature could be a comment on the presence of white colonization. Just as white men colonize Igbo society in Things Fall Apart, white literature has colonized Achebe's novel, wrestling the title out of his hands and claiming it for its own.  

How many U.S. presidents have died in office, and what were their names?

Eight United States Presidents have died in office.  Of these, four were assassinated.  These Presidents were:

William Henry Harrison, who died of pneumonia on April 4, 1841

Zachary Taylor, who died of a gastrointestinal illness on July 9, 1850

Abraham Lincoln, who was assassinated on April 14, 1865 - he died the next day

James Garfield, who was shot by an assassin on July 2, 1881 and died of complications from his injuries on September 19, 1881

William McKinley, who was also shot by an assassin on September 6, 1901 and died eight days later

Warren G. Harding, who died of a heart attack on August 2, 1923

Franklin D. Roosevelt, who died of a cerebral hemorrhage on April 12, 1945

John F. Kennedy, who was assassinated on November 22, 1963

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Can I be charged with criminal trespassing for unknowingly driving down a road marked "PR"?walking home the night before, a man lost his phone...

A private road can be used by the general public and is open to all who wish to use it, but it primarily benefits those at whose request it was established. Unlike highways that are cared for by the public at large, private roads are maintained at the expense of the private individuals who requested the road. (Law Encyclopedia at Answers.com)

A private road is a road owned and maintained by a private individual, organization, or company rather than by a government. Consequently, unauthorized use of the road may be considered trespassing, and some of the usual rules of the road may not apply. The most common type of private road is a residential road maintained by a homeowners association, housing co-op, or other group of individual homeowners. (Wikipedia definition)

By the information I found about private roads above, it seems that you may be accountable based on the laws of your state, but moreso if the road was marked with a "No Trespassing" sign which you say was not there.  I would definitely seek a different opinion as far as attorneys go, or maybe even hire your own if you are able.  Do you have any family or friends with law degrees or work as police or who know someone fitting these descriptions? 

Good Luck!

The second half of Hunters in the Snow includes some surprising twists and turns. How are these more meaningful and substantial than the random...

The twists in the story are more meaningful and substantial because Wolff is making a parody of the beliefs held by American Romantic writers (think of Thoreau and Whitman) who believed several key ideas: cities are vile and corrupt, the wilderness is a place of natural beauty and a place where one can gain a higher sense of truth, women are to be distrusted because they often try to corrupt and domestic man. 

In many Romantic works, a male enters the wilderness and strives survive on their own, the Romantics believed they were living honestly and deliberately (think of Thoreau's "Walden" as the classic example).

Now contrast that with what happens to Frank, Kenny, and Tub when they enter the wilderness to go hunting.  Unlike the romantics who found truth and power in natural and the wilderness Wolff's characters get lost (Tub literally gets lost while hunting), betray each other (Kenny begins shooting things in a maniacal fashion, eventually killing the farmers old dog, which lead to Tub shooting Kenny, which leads to their failed rescue), and eventually get caught up in the trivialities of their own lives (Frank ordering Tub dinner after he tells him about his affair with the baby sitter and Tub gladly devouring it after confessing to Frank that he has been a glutton all along and never attempted to diet at all.  Of course, all of this occurs while Kenny is freezing to death in the back of the truck). 

What is the nature of the deep fears and longings symbolized by Gothic fiction? Are the fears and longings different in the American Gothic?

A grand but complex question, or pair of questions. Broadly speaking, gothic literature addresses two sets of fears. One are the universal human fears: death, dying, suffering, loss, etc. Another set are more specific to the period in which the gothic emerged, and to the societies generating it. Consider, for example, the relationship between monster and creator in Frankenstein. That is very much shaped by period theories about parenthood, by Shelley's own experience of birth, and by class concerns. Therefore, yes, the American gothic would have some distinct fears. For example, it has different concerns about the past, and about the relationship of city and country, than the European gothic does.

How did monarchs in Spain, France & England use religion to solidify their power?This is during time period of 1500-1700.

During the 16th century the Catholic Church was all
powerful all over Europe. However, with the Reformation its power and authority came to
be challenged.The century following the Protestant Revolution was a gruesome one in
Europe. Catholics and Protestants were constantly at odds. People were disemboweled,
hung, and burned for practicing their chosen religion.


In
England Mary I (18 February 1516 – 17 November 1558) was the eldest daughter of the
 Protestant, Tudor King Henry VIII. On ascending the throne she quickly restored Roman
Catholicism in England. She was nicknamed "Bloody Mary" because she persecuted the
Protestants and burnt many of them at the stake.


Similarly,
King Charles I [1600-1649] who married a Catholic Princess and had Catholic sympathies
was executed by the Puritans led by Oliver Cromwell after a bloody Civil
War.


Oliver Cromwell [1599-1658] himself rigorously
enforced Puritanism during his rule.

How did monarchs in Spain, France & England use religion to solidify their power?This is during time period of 1500-1700.

During the 16th century the Catholic Church was all powerful all over Europe. However, with the Reformation its power and authority came to be challenged.The century following the Protestant Revolution was a gruesome one in Europe. Catholics and Protestants were constantly at odds. People were disemboweled, hung, and burned for practicing their chosen religion.


In England Mary I (18 February 1516 – 17 November 1558) was the eldest daughter of the  Protestant, Tudor King Henry VIII. On ascending the throne she quickly restored Roman Catholicism in England. She was nicknamed "Bloody Mary" because she persecuted the Protestants and burnt many of them at the stake.


Similarly, King Charles I [1600-1649] who married a Catholic Princess and had Catholic sympathies was executed by the Puritans led by Oliver Cromwell after a bloody Civil War.


Oliver Cromwell [1599-1658] himself rigorously enforced Puritanism during his rule.

Montag comes upon a group of men who welcome him to their campfire. How is the fire of the camp different from and fire Montag has ever known?

This fire is one of the first that Montag has seen used in the traditional sense. This fire is used for warmth and light instead of destruction and chaos. Montag finds it interesting that a fire can be used for good things, for the perpetuation of books rather than destruction of them. It is a warm inviting fire that is conducive to conversation and trading of portions of memorized books.

What are the most important allusions in the story Greasy Lake?What types of allusions are they (mythological, historical..) and how are they...

The most obvious allusions are to the Bible.  One of the allusions is related to baptism.  When the narrator flees and runs into the murky lake, he is, in effect, being baptised...his filthy character is now baptised in the filthy lake. Also, his "baptism" causes him to have an epiphany about his and his friends' behaviors.  The narrator realizes that he is not as "bad" as he thought he was, if "bad" at all! 

Another allusion to the bible is the narrator's car key.  When he finds it, it is referred to as the "grail" and it is the narrator's salvation in many ways. When the sun breaks at dawn, the narrator finds it gleaming in the same spot where he dropped it.  The key represents the narrator's escape (and his friends' escape) from the horrible night they've endured.  Now that the narrator has found the key, he and his friends can finally leave.

Why is Siddhartha disillusioned with performing the ritual of ablution?

Siddhartha becomes restless and begins to question his father's beliefs.  He feels that he has learned all he can from talking to the Brahmans and they can not give him the peace he seeks.  As Hesse writes in the first chapter: "The ablutions were good, but they were water, they did not wash off the sin, they did not heal the spirit's thirst, they did not relieve the fear in his heart."

With all this stirring inside of him Siddhartha decides to go on a quest to find what is missing within himself.

Explain the important symbols, examples of irony, suspense, foreshadowing and humor in chapter 23 & 24Such as the dewberry tarts symbolizing...

One other important symbol is the chest hair that Jem
shows to Scout, signifying that he is now entering into manhood and will in some ways
soon be separated from her because of that change.  This goes along with some of what he
is forced to deal with in the chapters as well.


A good
example of irony is found when looking at Aunt Alexandra's behavior.  She is unwilling
to have someone over for dinner, someone she considers beneath them, but she gives the
other ladies a very hard time about their hypocrisy at the missionary tea.  We don't
expect this from Alexandra but it provides a good example of the ironic behavior of some
of the characters.

Explain the important symbols, examples of irony, suspense, foreshadowing and humor in chapter 23 & 24Such as the dewberry tarts symbolizing...

One other important symbol is the chest hair that Jem shows to Scout, signifying that he is now entering into manhood and will in some ways soon be separated from her because of that change.  This goes along with some of what he is forced to deal with in the chapters as well.


A good example of irony is found when looking at Aunt Alexandra's behavior.  She is unwilling to have someone over for dinner, someone she considers beneath them, but she gives the other ladies a very hard time about their hypocrisy at the missionary tea.  We don't expect this from Alexandra but it provides a good example of the ironic behavior of some of the characters.

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Discuss the exposition, rising action, climax, falling action, and resolution in The Adventures of Tom Sawyer.

The exposition is the part of a story where background information on the characters and situations is presented.  Although the plot structure of "Adventures of Tom Sawyer" is a little different from the traditional in that it is made up in parts by a series of vignettes, I would say that the first seven chapters, in which the characters and their personalities are introduced, might serve as exposition for the main storyline. 

The climax, or point at which the main conflict reaches its greatest intensity, would be when Tom and Becky disappear on their excursion to the caves in Chapter XXXIX, and the resolution, when the main conflict is resolved, would take place in the final three chapters, when Tom and Becky are found, Injun Joe's fate is revealed, and Huck is taken in by the Widow Douglass. 

The rising action is the development of the plot from the exposition to the climax, or, in other words, everything that occurs between those two points.  In this particular book, the rising action would include the murder at the graveyard, the trial of Muff Potter, and the boys' search for the treasure and Injun Joe.  The falling action is everything that occurs between the climax and the resolution, and includes the search for Tom and Becky and Tom's "funeral". 

In The Red Badge of Courage, the youth fears two things. What are they? Also, find an example of personification in Chapter 2.

I think the two things the youth fears are the possibility that he will not be able to conduct himself honorably under battle conditions, and  the feeling that he is the only one that feels this way. He also fears that he is the only one who will be a coward and does not know how he is going to react in battle. 


The youth has "doubts which he privately acknowledge(s) in himself", and he expresses them in asking the loud soldier, "How do you know you won't run when the time comes?"  The soldier's comparatively confident response does not reassure the youth, and "his failure to discover any mite of resemblance in (his comrades') viewpoints (make) him more miserable than before...he (is) a mental outcast".  The youth is afraid of how he will react under battle conditions, and he is also afraid he is alone in his fears.


A good example of personification in Chapter 2 can be found in the eleventh paragraph.  The author is describing what the youth can see in the early morning, and gives human characteristics to both the fires of the opposing army and the rising sun.  He says, "from across the river the red eyes were still peering" in referring to the campfires, and describes the first daylight as "a yellow patch like a rug laid for the feet of the coming sun".

What are two examples of the gods interfering with the war?

You could argue that before the story began, the Trojans
had already received the help of Poseidon in building their wall, but thanks to their
lack of tribute he had withdrawn his protection, so perhaps that could be example number
one.


Of course for another you need look no farther than
the false dream sent to Agamemnon that suggested he would be able to capture the city in
one night if he only raised the army and sent it along to
Troy.


A third would be the fact that Aphrodite saves Paris
from death and whisks him away to the safety of his bedroom in
Troy.


But if you need more, it doesn't take much looking
through the story to find them, the gods couldn't keep their hands off of this
one!


After a lull in the fighting and exhaustion on both
sides leads to a truce, Hera schemes with a group of other gods to break the truce, we
can't have this boring peace now can we!


Very soon
thereafter, Diomedes comes whipping through the battle rampaging through various groups
and killing and wounding a huge number of combatants.  According to the
summary:



He
even wounds the goddess Aphrodite when she tries to rescue her son Aeneas, and the war
god Ares, when he tries to rally the Trojan forces. (Note:
aristeia” is a Greek word which means “excellence” and here refers
to an episode in which a particular character demonstrates exceptional valor or
merit.)



Later on in the
battle Zeus and Poseidon both help the Achaeans protect their ships from the marauding
Trojans intent on burning them.


Basically, if you read the
story, you can't help but run across gods interfering, without them, the Trojans and the
Achaeans would have been drinking together on the beach for a few weeks instead of
fighting this incredibly battle.

What are two examples of the gods interfering with the war?

You could argue that before the story began, the Trojans had already received the help of Poseidon in building their wall, but thanks to their lack of tribute he had withdrawn his protection, so perhaps that could be example number one.


Of course for another you need look no farther than the false dream sent to Agamemnon that suggested he would be able to capture the city in one night if he only raised the army and sent it along to Troy.


A third would be the fact that Aphrodite saves Paris from death and whisks him away to the safety of his bedroom in Troy.


But if you need more, it doesn't take much looking through the story to find them, the gods couldn't keep their hands off of this one!


After a lull in the fighting and exhaustion on both sides leads to a truce, Hera schemes with a group of other gods to break the truce, we can't have this boring peace now can we!


Very soon thereafter, Diomedes comes whipping through the battle rampaging through various groups and killing and wounding a huge number of combatants.  According to the summary:



He even wounds the goddess Aphrodite when she tries to rescue her son Aeneas, and the war god Ares, when he tries to rally the Trojan forces. (Note: “aristeia” is a Greek word which means “excellence” and here refers to an episode in which a particular character demonstrates exceptional valor or merit.)



Later on in the battle Zeus and Poseidon both help the Achaeans protect their ships from the marauding Trojans intent on burning them.


Basically, if you read the story, you can't help but run across gods interfering, without them, the Trojans and the Achaeans would have been drinking together on the beach for a few weeks instead of fighting this incredibly battle.

How does Antonio changed in the course of The Merchant of Venice?What is Antonio's character development?

The text of The Merchant of Venice
indicates that Antonio doesn't change at all through the course of the play. In this
regard, the literary element of character change would be antithetically presented in a
staunchly unchanging character who holds fast to errors despite drastic situations that
call for a change of character. One instance of Antonio's errors, which are derived from
his character traits, is the fact that he seems to actually lie in the opening scene
when he tells Salarino and Salanio that his wealth is not all in one venture nor
dependent upon the financial success of that one year. His dishonest remarks to Salarino
and Salario are revealed in his conversation with Bassanio in which he says that "all my
fortunes are at sea; / Neither have I money nor commodity / To raise a present
sum."


Another instance of Antonio's errors is what is
revealed about his behavior while Bassanio and he are in negotiation for a loan with
Shylock, who reveals that Antonio has hurled names at Shylock and spit on him and that
he "did void [his] rheum upon [Shylock's] beard" and " foot [Shylock] as [he would]
spurn a stranger cur." Antonio doesn't deny that he took such base actions, in fact, he
confirms it: "I am as like to call thee so again, / To spit on thee again, to spurn thee
too."


During the conclusion of the trail, when Shylock's
punishment is being decided, Antonio successfully contributes to Shylock's punishment by
continuing to persecute and impose his will upon Shylock and requiring, among other
things, that Shylock convert to Christianity. Later, this same manipulative streak is
displayed when he requires that Bassanio give Portia's ring to the lawyer/Portia against
his will, as he swore to never part with it. He even speaks for Bessanio by pledging his
own life again and saying that Bessanio swears to never break another oath given to
Portia.


The most telling point that indicates there is no
change in Antonio is that at the close of the play, he still thinks of Shylock as a
despicable Jew and doesn't even entertain an idea that recognizes Shylock as a human,
and one who has been seriously mistreated, so seriously as to drive him to strike a
bargain for a pound of flesh.

How does Antonio changed in the course of The Merchant of Venice?What is Antonio's character development?

The text of The Merchant of Venice indicates that Antonio doesn't change at all through the course of the play. In this regard, the literary element of character change would be antithetically presented in a staunchly unchanging character who holds fast to errors despite drastic situations that call for a change of character. One instance of Antonio's errors, which are derived from his character traits, is the fact that he seems to actually lie in the opening scene when he tells Salarino and Salanio that his wealth is not all in one venture nor dependent upon the financial success of that one year. His dishonest remarks to Salarino and Salario are revealed in his conversation with Bassanio in which he says that "all my fortunes are at sea; / Neither have I money nor commodity / To raise a present sum."


Another instance of Antonio's errors is what is revealed about his behavior while Bassanio and he are in negotiation for a loan with Shylock, who reveals that Antonio has hurled names at Shylock and spit on him and that he "did void [his] rheum upon [Shylock's] beard" and " foot [Shylock] as [he would] spurn a stranger cur." Antonio doesn't deny that he took such base actions, in fact, he confirms it: "I am as like to call thee so again, / To spit on thee again, to spurn thee too."


During the conclusion of the trail, when Shylock's punishment is being decided, Antonio successfully contributes to Shylock's punishment by continuing to persecute and impose his will upon Shylock and requiring, among other things, that Shylock convert to Christianity. Later, this same manipulative streak is displayed when he requires that Bassanio give Portia's ring to the lawyer/Portia against his will, as he swore to never part with it. He even speaks for Bessanio by pledging his own life again and saying that Bessanio swears to never break another oath given to Portia.


The most telling point that indicates there is no change in Antonio is that at the close of the play, he still thinks of Shylock as a despicable Jew and doesn't even entertain an idea that recognizes Shylock as a human, and one who has been seriously mistreated, so seriously as to drive him to strike a bargain for a pound of flesh.

Monday, November 18, 2013

Why does the savage instigate a riot?

The way that he incites the riot is by disrupting the
distribution of soma to the deltas at the hospital.  They are all looking forward to
their dose and are outraged when he starts to throw it
away


The reason why he does it is that he does not think
that people should drug themselves to the point where they have no feelings.  John is
upset because his mother has just died and no one is acting as if it matters.  He feels
that it is terrible to live a life where you don't even care about someone
dying.

Why does the savage instigate a riot?

The way that he incites the riot is by disrupting the distribution of soma to the deltas at the hospital.  They are all looking forward to their dose and are outraged when he starts to throw it away


The reason why he does it is that he does not think that people should drug themselves to the point where they have no feelings.  John is upset because his mother has just died and no one is acting as if it matters.  He feels that it is terrible to live a life where you don't even care about someone dying.

How is George Orwell persuading us (responders) throughout Animal Farm? What techniques does he use to persuade us?

Written with the subtitle a fairy story, satire is
definitely the strongest persuasive technique used by Orwell. Through his allegorical
tale in which farm animals take on characteristics associated with human counterparts,
Orwell sends a message that it id important for us to guard out freedom, to keep an eye
on those who lead us lest they become too powerful. It is a tale of a people's
(animal's) violent revolution and subsequent inability to hold on to the positive
changes they had fought for because of the ulterior motives of the equality to new
leadership who go from champions of equality to quasi-benevolent dictators in rapid
succession.The idea of a socialist Utopia was something that, as political  scientists
throughout history have noted, looks great on paper but fails in practice as human
nature doesn't work that way. An element od satire, then, is irony as what starts as a
good plan ends up in something evil and potentially worse than what they had when they
started. Greed tends to be as powerful motivator, and the satirical humor factor lies in
the fact that Orwell makes the greedy "pigs"- traditionally an animal that is seen as
noxious and gluttonous. Although the novel is meant as a satirical examination of the
Russian Revolution, the theme is universal as this could happen
anywhere.


Two other themes in the novel that help persuade
are the use of Snowball as a scapegoat (how many times in our own world has the one
good, well-meaning person been the target for blame?). By making everything out to be
Snowball's fault, thye people (animal's) attention is distracted from the truth and they
blindly follow Napolean. Secondly, the use if religion as a means of controlling the
masses. By changing the commandments, the "word of God" so to speak is changed, but as
long as the masses still believe it to be true it can be used to keep them in line. This
is how the Christian Bible is used in this country as a means of making people follow
certain ideologies even though the Bible itslef has been rewritten so many times that
non one can really know what it once said. The same can be said od the current Jihad and
Muslim extremists - manipulating a text to match a different set of personal
aims.


He also emphasizes the importance of knowledge for it
is the animal's ignorance that gets them into the situation that they end up in.
Napolean appears to value education, but only to an extent and to the extent at which he
can use it for control. They begin with an admirable goal, rallying the masses to rise
up against an unfair oppressor, but they end up allowing one of their own to take that
same position. The idea of those who do not learn from the past are doomed to keep on
making the same mistakes prevails in this piece so that the strongest persuasive message
comes in the fact that we must be aware and take responsibility for the actions of those
who lead us if we want to have a real say in our governance.

How is George Orwell persuading us (responders) throughout Animal Farm? What techniques does he use to persuade us?

Written with the subtitle a fairy story, satire is definitely the strongest persuasive technique used by Orwell. Through his allegorical tale in which farm animals take on characteristics associated with human counterparts, Orwell sends a message that it id important for us to guard out freedom, to keep an eye on those who lead us lest they become too powerful. It is a tale of a people's (animal's) violent revolution and subsequent inability to hold on to the positive changes they had fought for because of the ulterior motives of the equality to new leadership who go from champions of equality to quasi-benevolent dictators in rapid succession.The idea of a socialist Utopia was something that, as political  scientists throughout history have noted, looks great on paper but fails in practice as human nature doesn't work that way. An element od satire, then, is irony as what starts as a good plan ends up in something evil and potentially worse than what they had when they started. Greed tends to be as powerful motivator, and the satirical humor factor lies in the fact that Orwell makes the greedy "pigs"- traditionally an animal that is seen as noxious and gluttonous. Although the novel is meant as a satirical examination of the Russian Revolution, the theme is universal as this could happen anywhere.


Two other themes in the novel that help persuade are the use of Snowball as a scapegoat (how many times in our own world has the one good, well-meaning person been the target for blame?). By making everything out to be Snowball's fault, thye people (animal's) attention is distracted from the truth and they blindly follow Napolean. Secondly, the use if religion as a means of controlling the masses. By changing the commandments, the "word of God" so to speak is changed, but as long as the masses still believe it to be true it can be used to keep them in line. This is how the Christian Bible is used in this country as a means of making people follow certain ideologies even though the Bible itslef has been rewritten so many times that non one can really know what it once said. The same can be said od the current Jihad and Muslim extremists - manipulating a text to match a different set of personal aims.


He also emphasizes the importance of knowledge for it is the animal's ignorance that gets them into the situation that they end up in. Napolean appears to value education, but only to an extent and to the extent at which he can use it for control. They begin with an admirable goal, rallying the masses to rise up against an unfair oppressor, but they end up allowing one of their own to take that same position. The idea of those who do not learn from the past are doomed to keep on making the same mistakes prevails in this piece so that the strongest persuasive message comes in the fact that we must be aware and take responsibility for the actions of those who lead us if we want to have a real say in our governance.

How do we tackle the vision of the Edward Albee in "The Zoo Story"? To what extent did Edward Albee succeed in transferring his vision to the...

Well, if we were going to assume that each playwright has a specific, unified vision, we could not find it in a single work. Instead, we'd look at the entire body of work, published and unpublished, and would look at unifying themes and techniques.
That said, there may be reasons why the play was first produced in Germany. The vision it gives of America is an outsider's view, and not a happy one or unified one. Through the choice to have extended talk with very little action, then an explosive conclusion, we see disintegration of word and deed, and even alienation. In the specific characters chosen, and the reasons they both talk and clash, we see a hollow life. If we have to conclude what Albee's vision is from this, then, we see an unhappy one, and one that is going to be intentionally somewhat disturbing to audiences. 

Give a brief summary of "Gone with the Wind."

Scarlet O'Hara - spoiled and attractive oldest daughter of southern plantation owners on the eve of the Civil War.  Scarlet has decided that she loves a man she cannot have - Ashley Wilkes. He is betrothed to another woman, Melanie Hamilton.  In spite, Scarlet marries Melanie's brother, Charles, who dies from measles before going to war leaving Scarlet a young and bored widow.  She goes to Atlanta to live with an aunt.  There she encounters, for the second time, Rhett Butler, who seems to be the only man who sees Scarlet for the woman she is. The war continues and Atlanta is seiged while Melanie is giving birth.  Scarlet takes Melanie and baby, her own son, and one servant and sets out for her home, Tara.  She finds it still standing but devastated.  Her mother has died and her father is mentally unstable.  Slowly, through hard work, Scarlet makes Tara a working plantation again until taxes come due.  She goes to Atlanta to get help from Rhett but ends up marrying her sister's beau, Frank Kennedy, with whom she has a daughter. Frank is killed in a raid and Scarlet is again a widow.  She marries Rhett and has a daughter, Bonnie.  Rhett knows Scarlet still pines for Ashley, but for the sake of their daughter, he puts on a good face.  Bonnie is killed in an accident.  Melanie, who is pregnant again, dies.  Rhett says he's leaving. Scarlet begs him to stay because she loves him now.

Sunday, November 17, 2013

What is the verbal irony in "The Most Dangerous Game"?what is the irony too.?

 Another example:

After dinner, when Rainsford declines General Zaroff's invitation to visit the trophy room by stating that he is not feeling well.  Zaroff comments, "You need a good, restful night's sleep.  Tomorrow you'll feel like a new man...we'll hunt, eh?  I've one rather promising prospect--"

Of course, later the reader realizes that Rainsford is the "prospect."  But the verbal irony is that at the time Rainsford has no idea that he is going to be the "prospect," and, he will, indeed, "feel like a new man"--a hunted man.

Saturday, November 16, 2013

Is it possible to have multiple teeth growing in one root? If yes, is there a specific term for it?My 6 year old kid went to the dentist today and...

Very odd!  I don't know about having more than one tooth in a single root, but I have read articles about people who inherently have more than the normal two sets of teeth.  Do you have this in your family?  Check the link below to read some of the stories of people with 3 or more sets of teeth in their lifetime.  Perhaps your child also has the possibility of more than two sets of teeth and the multiples pulled from the one root are proof.  I haven't read anything about a particular name for this condition.  Did you ask your dentist?

Can you please explain me this poem in brief?"The Road Not Taken" by Robert Frost

In Robert Frost's "The Road Not Taken," the controlling
metaphor of the poem, of course, is that life has many paths which one can take; thus,
there is a tension in the poem between the choice that the speaker has made with the one
that he has not taken.  In the first lines of the second stanza, the speaker indicates
that he is somewhat of an Emersonian, for he "creates a path" for himself on the one
that has become "grassy" and "want[ing] wear."


Yet, there
is a conservative side to the speaker as well since, he writes, "Oh, I kept the first
for another day!"  Here,he does not wish to lose the other opportunity in life, essaying
to reserve this other path as he convinces himself that one is as good as the other. 
However, his direction is set for him as he traverses the first path, for "way leads on
to way."  That is, his destiny is set by the first choice that he has made.  And, it is
this fixing of one's destiny that the speaker rues:


readability="15">

I shall be telling this with a
sigh


Somewhere ages and ages
hence:


Two roads diverged in a wood, and
I--


I took the one less traveled
by,


And that has made all the
difference.



How often one
hears a person wonder "what if....?"  What if I had go to a different school?  What if I
had gone to a trade school instead of college?  What if I had moved somewhere else? 
What if I had not done_____, not married _____etc.  One or two major choices can
determine the direction of one's life, indubitably, and "make all the difference," for,
as Thomas Wolfe wrote "You can't go home again"--one can not return to what one once
was.


As a note:  Be careful when interpreting/explaining a
poem that you point to lines that support what you conclude because what you think
(opinion) never carries any weight or has any verity unless you can support this
judgment with lines, passages, etc. from the text. 

Can you please explain me this poem in brief?"The Road Not Taken" by Robert Frost

In Robert Frost's "The Road Not Taken," the controlling metaphor of the poem, of course, is that life has many paths which one can take; thus, there is a tension in the poem between the choice that the speaker has made with the one that he has not taken.  In the first lines of the second stanza, the speaker indicates that he is somewhat of an Emersonian, for he "creates a path" for himself on the one that has become "grassy" and "want[ing] wear."


Yet, there is a conservative side to the speaker as well since, he writes, "Oh, I kept the first for another day!"  Here,he does not wish to lose the other opportunity in life, essaying to reserve this other path as he convinces himself that one is as good as the other.  However, his direction is set for him as he traverses the first path, for "way leads on to way."  That is, his destiny is set by the first choice that he has made.  And, it is this fixing of one's destiny that the speaker rues:



I shall be telling this with a sigh


Somewhere ages and ages hence:


Two roads diverged in a wood, and I--


I took the one less traveled by,


And that has made all the difference.



How often one hears a person wonder "what if....?"  What if I had go to a different school?  What if I had gone to a trade school instead of college?  What if I had moved somewhere else?  What if I had not done_____, not married _____etc.  One or two major choices can determine the direction of one's life, indubitably, and "make all the difference," for, as Thomas Wolfe wrote "You can't go home again"--one can not return to what one once was.


As a note:  Be careful when interpreting/explaining a poem that you point to lines that support what you conclude because what you think (opinion) never carries any weight or has any verity unless you can support this judgment with lines, passages, etc. from the text. 

Friday, November 15, 2013

In "Fahrenheit 451", does Montag gain any benefits from his books?Fahrenheit 451

Montag gains the courage needed to stand up for something in which he believes.  He does not think that people should just sit in their living rooms and listen to the walls.  Claire has opened his eyes to the possibilities of the future as well as the memories of the past--she is the beginning of the questions Montag begins to ask, and books finish the job.  Through books, Montag has learned to question and not to just accept what he is told.  He rejects the information fed to him by Faber about why books must be burned.  He makes a choice to keep the books even though he is afraid of the hound and of the consequences.  Books change him into a better, more thoughtful human being.

What are the symbols of The Phantom of the Opera?

Here are a few for starters: 

The cript of Christine's father is a symbol--the family name is DAAE pronounced "die" and she undoubtedly thinks of death as a friend having been orphaned and tormented with internal and external conflicts through the opera, her musical training, and her purpose in life.

The Opera itself is a symbol.  It symbolizes sanctuary for all the orphans and escapees--the phantom, Christine, other dancers and actors without any other place to go.

The mask the phantom wears is a symbol.  It is is safe-haven outside of the catacombs of the opera.  His way of hiding the hideously deformed face from society--his beautiful face to go with the beauty of his musical talent.

Music is a symbol--it is the hope and life-giving blood of so many, but especially the phantom and Christine.  The phantom's voice has come to Christine in many hours of need.  She has clung to it as her father told her on his deathbed that he would send her the Angel of Music to look after her in his absence.  Music is the connection between the phantom and Christine, and the phantom has trained her secretly for years developing her lovely voice.

In what ways did Kenny think Rufus could be his personal savior?

Before Rufus came along, Kenny had been the butt of the other kids jokes and taunts. When the new kid, Rufus, comes aboard, Kenny realizes he is a loner, as well. Kenny believes that Rufus will be his"saver" by taking the mean spirited attention away from Kenny, and having it directed at himself.

Initially, Kenny even participates in the jeers and taunts, but then discovers he does not care to be one of those kids and stops. Eventually, a friendship will occur between the two outcasts.

In Frankenstein, describe the creature's feelings towards Victor when he first came to life.How do they differ from victor's first reaction to his...

When the monster awakens, Victor runs from the room in abhorrence.  He is ashamed at what he has done in creating this creature and terrified of the implications of the creation.  So, he does the really mature thing (sarcasm there), and runs away, completely ignoring the problem.

The monster, however, does not have the ability to process his feelings towards Victor when he first awakens.  He only knows sensation, like a baby, and does not have specific feelings towards any one person.  He says this of his first few days:

It is with considerable difficulty that I remember the original era of my being: all the events of that period appear confused and indistinct. A strange multiplicity of sensations seized me, and I saw, felt, heard, and smelt, at the same time; and it was, indeed, a long time before I learned to distinguish between the operations of my various senses.

Only after spending time observing the family in the woods is the monster able to process emotion and to evaluate Victor, Victor's actions, and his own feelings about them.  The monster is angry at being abandoned and at being put into exile on account of his creation.  However, he is willing to put those feelings aside if Victor will just provide him with a companion. 

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Who built the Suez Canal, why is it important, and when was it built?

The Suez Canal was built in the 1860s.  It opened in
1869.


The canal was built by a company called the Suez
Canal Company.  It was a company that was owned mostly by investors in France, but there
was some Egyptian participation in the ownership.  The actual work was done by
Egyptians, many of whom were forced to work by their
government.


The canal was important because it would cut
huge amounts of time off the shipment of goods from Asia to Europe.  This was important
for everyone, and especially for the British because it made it easier for them to trade
with their colony in India.

Who built the Suez Canal, why is it important, and when was it built?

The Suez Canal was built in the 1860s.  It opened in 1869.


The canal was built by a company called the Suez Canal Company.  It was a company that was owned mostly by investors in France, but there was some Egyptian participation in the ownership.  The actual work was done by Egyptians, many of whom were forced to work by their government.


The canal was important because it would cut huge amounts of time off the shipment of goods from Asia to Europe.  This was important for everyone, and especially for the British because it made it easier for them to trade with their colony in India.

What is the significance of Walter's last dream where he faces the "firing squad"?

Walter Mitty's final daydream in which he is standing
before a firing squad seems to reveal a secret death wish and to show that he is a very
unhappy man. He dislikes himself, dislikes his nagging wife, and dislikes the life he
has to lead. He is living in depressing times because the world seems to be on the brink
of another great war. He is too old to make any radical changes. In the first dream
episode involving the hydroplane, the crewmen refer to Mitty as "the Old
Man."



"The Old
Man'll get us through," they said to one another. "The Old Man ain't afraid of
Hell!"



Thurber never
specifies Walter Mitty's age, but he seems to be at least in his late forties, if not in
his early fifties. No doubt he has some kind of mid-level office job, like Erwin Martin
in "The Catbird Seat." In another of Mitty's fantasies he is an daredevil pilot in World
War I. In this episode he imagines the following
dialogue:



"We
only live once, Sergeant," said Mitty, with his faint, fleeting smile. "Or do
we?"



His afterthought seems
to suggest that Mitty feels he has never had a real life. He is currently living a life
directed by his wife. This daydream in which Captain Mitty is going on a suicidal
mission may also indicate a death wish. 


When Mitty kills
some time in a hotel lobby and picks up a copy of Liberty magazine,
we get a clue to his age:


readability="6">

"Can Germany Conquer the World Through the Air?"
Walter Mitty looked at the pictures of bombing planes and of ruined
streets.



The
Liberty article obviously refers to incidents in the late 1930s,
but Mitty puts himself back into the first World War as an aviator. This may be
Thurber's way of showing Mitty's age. He knows he would be too old to fly modern fighter
planes. Chances are he never served in World War I, but only fantasizes about having
been in it. Thurber himself was flatly rejected because of his extremely poor vision. He
writes about this experience in one of his humor pieces titled "Draft Board
Nights."


In the hydroplane episode and in the World War I
episode, Mitty is risking his life. Appropriately, he is facing certain death before a
firing squad at the end. The reader would be justified in assuming that Walter Mitty,
while leading a "secret life," is also harboring a secret death
wish.

What is the significance of Walter's last dream where he faces the "firing squad"?

Walter Mitty's final daydream in which he is standing before a firing squad seems to reveal a secret death wish and to show that he is a very unhappy man. He dislikes himself, dislikes his nagging wife, and dislikes the life he has to lead. He is living in depressing times because the world seems to be on the brink of another great war. He is too old to make any radical changes. In the first dream episode involving the hydroplane, the crewmen refer to Mitty as "the Old Man."



"The Old Man'll get us through," they said to one another. "The Old Man ain't afraid of Hell!"



Thurber never specifies Walter Mitty's age, but he seems to be at least in his late forties, if not in his early fifties. No doubt he has some kind of mid-level office job, like Erwin Martin in "The Catbird Seat." In another of Mitty's fantasies he is an daredevil pilot in World War I. In this episode he imagines the following dialogue:



"We only live once, Sergeant," said Mitty, with his faint, fleeting smile. "Or do we?"



His afterthought seems to suggest that Mitty feels he has never had a real life. He is currently living a life directed by his wife. This daydream in which Captain Mitty is going on a suicidal mission may also indicate a death wish. 


When Mitty kills some time in a hotel lobby and picks up a copy of Liberty magazine, we get a clue to his age:



"Can Germany Conquer the World Through the Air?" Walter Mitty looked at the pictures of bombing planes and of ruined streets.



The Liberty article obviously refers to incidents in the late 1930s, but Mitty puts himself back into the first World War as an aviator. This may be Thurber's way of showing Mitty's age. He knows he would be too old to fly modern fighter planes. Chances are he never served in World War I, but only fantasizes about having been in it. Thurber himself was flatly rejected because of his extremely poor vision. He writes about this experience in one of his humor pieces titled "Draft Board Nights."


In the hydroplane episode and in the World War I episode, Mitty is risking his life. Appropriately, he is facing certain death before a firing squad at the end. The reader would be justified in assuming that Walter Mitty, while leading a "secret life," is also harboring a secret death wish.

What would happen to Ichabod when he would walk home at night after spending the afternoon reading?

After school got out Ichabod would sometimes read all afternoon until he could no longer see the words printed in his book. When he could no longer see he would begin to make his way home. ". . . every sound of nature, at that witching  hour, fluttered his excited imagination." He would allow his imagination to run away with him so much so that at hearing these sounds (the whip-poor-will, the tree toads, the screech owl, and frightened birds) he would become frightened. He was so frightened that he was "ready to give up the ghost with the idea that he was struck with a witch's token" or that he would almost die with fright and think a curse had been laid upon him. In order to frighten evil spirits and his fears away he could often be heard by the citizens of Sleepy Hollow, singing "pslam tunes" on his walk home.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

What details in Part III suggest that Farquhar's journey occurs in his mind?

To me, there are a few major things that suggest that this
journey is not truly taking place.


First, he seems too
aware for it to be real.  He is, for example, able to see the bullets that have hit the
water and are drifting down towards where he is.  That seems
unrealistic.


Second, his consciousness seems sort of
weird.  He sees his own hands as separate from himself.  He sees this vortex of color
where everything (trees, sky, etc) is indistinct.


Finally,
the soldiers' actions seem unlikely.  This is especially true of the cannon.  It seems
so unlikely that they would fire a cannonball (not very accurate) at him.  And then it
seems unlikely that they would miss if they used grapeshot.

What details in Part III suggest that Farquhar's journey occurs in his mind?

To me, there are a few major things that suggest that this journey is not truly taking place.


First, he seems too aware for it to be real.  He is, for example, able to see the bullets that have hit the water and are drifting down towards where he is.  That seems unrealistic.


Second, his consciousness seems sort of weird.  He sees his own hands as separate from himself.  He sees this vortex of color where everything (trees, sky, etc) is indistinct.


Finally, the soldiers' actions seem unlikely.  This is especially true of the cannon.  It seems so unlikely that they would fire a cannonball (not very accurate) at him.  And then it seems unlikely that they would miss if they used grapeshot.

What is Thomas Moore's "The Harp that Once ThroughTara's Halls" about?

This poem is about a couple of
things.


First of all, it is about how things that are
famous and important at one point come to be dead and irrelevant later on.  It is the
idea that even the famous and important die and become
nothing.


Second, this is a poem about Irish nationalism. 
This poem was written at a time when England ruled Ireland.  The poem uses the ancient
seat of Irish kings -- Tara -- as a symbol for Irish independence.  It is saying that
Irish independence will survive as long as "some heart indignant
breaks."

In Act III, scene 2, why may the establishment of Claudius's guilt be considered the crisis of the revenge plot?

The crisis of a drama usually proceeds and leads to the climax.  In Shakespeare's Hamlet , the proof that Claudius is guilty...