Certainly, there is a part of the quote that is quite accurate. Oedipus is not entirely and fully responsible for his fate. Yet, I would suggest that we cannot call him entirely "innocent" because he does demonstrate a sense of hubris when it is not necessary. His repudiation of Tiresias and of the belief that he is subject to the will of the fates are examples of a character flaw. While this is not deliberate, I cannot feel entirely comfortable calling him "innocent." He does understand, at the end, his own lack of vision. Certainly, it is noted that he does suffer for being human, no more, no less. In terms of the Gods being evil, I think that similar analysis applies for it does not seem like the gods deliberately target Oedipus. Rather, he becomes a part of the larger drama. While the gods could have done more to spare him, they do not strike me as overtly evil for, in this case, if the standard for evil is the mere not taking action, a very rigid definition emerges.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
In Act III, scene 2, why may the establishment of Claudius's guilt be considered the crisis of the revenge plot?
The crisis of a drama usually proceeds and leads to the climax. In Shakespeare's Hamlet , the proof that Claudius is guilty...
-
Montag recognizes himself in Clarisse's eyes, indicating that there is a reflection of himself in her. Although he doesn't fully re...
-
Jem and Scout's visit to First Purchase African M.E. Church is significant for many reasons. First, the children experience racism for t...
-
The Nazis used hunger, fear, and violence to indoctrinate the prisoners into camp. The Nazis broke the prisoners down to their most basic an...
No comments:
Post a Comment